Commit 26a601ee authored by Better Builder's avatar Better Builder

Latest generated content.

parent f513007f
......@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
<p>Even though this rule is hardcoded into the blockerList.json that’s in the Blocker content blocker extension, that’s only used until the actual data is downloaded via Git. After that, the blockerList.json file from the data-for-apps repository is used. This is the file that adds the rule to that (main) blocker list file.</p>
<pre><code class="mson"><span class="punctuation">-</span> <span class="key top-level">trigger</span><span class="punctuation">:</span>
<span class="punctuation">-</span> <span class="key">url-filter</span><span class="punctuation">:</span> <span class="value">localhost:8000/test.js</span>
<span class="punctuation">-</span> <span class="key">load-type</span><span class="punctuation">:</span> <span class="value">first-party</span>
<span class="punctuation">-</span> <span class="key top-level">action</span><span class="punctuation">:</span>
<span class="punctuation">-</span> <span class="key">type</span><span class="punctuation">:</span> <span class="value">block</span>
</code></pre>
......
This diff is collapsed.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<svg width="600px" height="36px" viewBox="0 0 600 36" version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<svg width="660px" height="36px" viewBox="0 0 660 36" version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<!-- Generator: Sketch 3.8.3 (29802) - http://www.bohemiancoding.com/sketch -->
<title>flags</title>
<desc>Created with Sketch.</desc>
......@@ -86,8 +86,8 @@
<g id="Слой_1">
<rect id="Rectangle-path" fill="#3F51B5" x="0" y="0" width="60" height="36"></rect>
<g id="Group" fill="#FFFFFF">
<polygon id="Shape" points="0 5.42057143 28.3772727 21.7735714 32.6440909 15.1907143 6.28363636 -1.77635684e-15 0 -1.77635684e-15"></polygon>
<polygon id="Shape" points="60 -1.77635684e-15 55.0786364 -1.77635684e-15 28.7195455 15.1894286 32.985 21.7735714 60 6.20485714"></polygon>
<polygon id="Shape" points="0 5.42057143 28.3772727 21.7735714 32.6440909 15.1907143 6.28363636 1.77635684e-15 0 1.77635684e-15"></polygon>
<polygon id="Shape" points="60 1.77635684e-15 55.0786364 1.77635684e-15 28.7195455 15.1894286 32.985 21.7735714 60 6.20485714"></polygon>
<polygon id="Shape" points="32.985 13.2055714 28.7195455 19.7884286 56.8513636 36 60 36 60 28.773"></polygon>
<polygon id="Shape" points="0 29.5598571 0 36 4.51363636 36 32.6440909 19.7897143 28.3786364 13.2055714"></polygon>
<rect id="Rectangle-path" x="0" y="12" width="60" height="12"></rect>
......@@ -128,6 +128,15 @@
</g>
</g>
</g>
<g id="Denmark" transform="translate(600.000000, 0.000000)">
<g id="Слой_1">
<rect id="Rectangle-path" fill="#FF3D00" x="0" y="0" width="60" height="36"></rect>
<g id="Group" fill="#ECEFF1">
<polygon id="Rectangle-path" points="0 14 60 14 60 21 0 21"></polygon>
<rect id="Rectangle-path" x="19" y="0" width="8" height="36"></rect>
</g>
</g>
</g>
</g>
</g>
</svg>
\ No newline at end of file
This diff is collapsed.
......@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
<li><a href="#uk">United Kingdom</a></li>
<li><a href="#bulgaria">Bulgaria</a></li>
<li><a href="#slovakia">Slovakia</a></li>
<li><a href="#denmark">Denmark</a></li>
</ul>
<h2 id="united-states">United States</h2>
......@@ -251,6 +252,16 @@
<p><span class="left-quote"></span>Keeps your information private, pages are not so huge anymore and load much quicker.</p>
<p>I love this blocker just works.<span class="right-quote"></span></p>
</div>
</section>
<h2 id="denmark">Denmark</h2>
<section class="review">
<h3>We need more of this<span class="rating rating-5">5 stars</span></h3>
<p class="credit">byMokuzen - Jun 9, 2016</p>
<div class="description">
<p><span class="left-quote"></span>It not only works; it also informs and it is ethical. Thank you Ind.ie.<span class="right-quote"></span></p>
</div>
</section></div></section></main>
<footer class="site-footer">
<div class="footer-wrap">
......
......@@ -143,11 +143,11 @@
<ul class="improvements">
<li data-set-repeat="statistic statistics" data-set-attribute="class statistic.type" class="requests">
<h3 class="improvement">
<strong class="amount" data-set-text="statistic.improvement.amount">46%</strong>
<strong class="amount" data-set-text="statistic.improvement.amount">45%</strong>
<span class="type" data-set-text="statistic.improvement.type">Safer</span>
</h3>
<p class="details">
<strong class="primary" data-set-text="statistic.improvement.details.primary">130 requests</strong>
<strong class="primary" data-set-text="statistic.improvement.details.primary">128 requests</strong>
<span class="secondary" data-set-text="statistic.improvement.details.secondary">blocked</span>
</p>
</li><li data-set-attribute="class statistic.type" data-set-alias="statistic statistics 1" data-set-dummy="1" class="weight">
......@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@
<span class="type" data-set-text="statistic.improvement.type">Lighter</span>
</h3>
<p class="details">
<strong class="primary" data-set-text="statistic.improvement.details.primary">2.11 MB</strong>
<strong class="primary" data-set-text="statistic.improvement.details.primary">2.08 MB</strong>
<span class="secondary" data-set-text="statistic.improvement.details.secondary">saved</span>
</p>
</li><li data-set-attribute="class statistic.type" data-set-alias="statistic statistics 2" data-set-dummy="1" class="speed">
......@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
<span class="type" data-set-text="statistic.improvement.type">Faster</span>
</h3>
<p class="details">
<strong class="primary" data-set-text="statistic.improvement.details.primary">32.09 seconds</strong>
<strong class="primary" data-set-text="statistic.improvement.details.primary">31.93 seconds</strong>
<span class="secondary" data-set-text="statistic.improvement.details.secondary">saved</span>
</p>
</li>
......@@ -180,17 +180,17 @@
<tr data-set-repeat="statistic statistics">
<th scope="row" data-set-attribute="class statistic.type" data-set-text="statistic.label" class="requests">Requests:</th>
<td><span data-set-text="statistic.values.before">283 requests</span></td>
<td><span data-set-text="statistic.values.after">153 requests</span></td>
<td><span data-set-text="statistic.improvement.amount">46%</span></td>
<td><span data-set-text="statistic.values.after">155 requests</span></td>
<td><span data-set-text="statistic.improvement.amount">45%</span></td>
</tr><tr data-set-alias="statistic statistics 1" data-set-dummy="1">
<th scope="row" data-set-attribute="class statistic.type" data-set-text="statistic.label" class="weight">Weight:</th>
<td><span data-set-text="statistic.values.before">5.23 MB</span></td>
<td><span data-set-text="statistic.values.after">3.11 MB</span></td>
<td><span data-set-text="statistic.values.after">3.14 MB</span></td>
<td><span data-set-text="statistic.improvement.amount">40%</span></td>
</tr><tr data-set-alias="statistic statistics 2" data-set-dummy="1">
<th scope="row" data-set-attribute="class statistic.type" data-set-text="statistic.label" class="speed">Speed:</th>
<td><span data-set-text="statistic.values.before">52.11 seconds</span></td>
<td><span data-set-text="statistic.values.after">20.02 seconds</span></td>
<td><span data-set-text="statistic.values.after">20.18 seconds</span></td>
<td><span data-set-text="statistic.improvement.amount">2.6×</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
......
This diff is collapsed.
......@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
<p>We’ve also compiled a list of answers to the most common questions we receive below.</p>
<h2>Does Better only work with Safari?</h2>
<h2 id="does-better-only-work-with-safari">Does Better only work with Safari?</h2>
<p><strong>Yes.</strong></p>
......@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
<p>Better is <a href="">a native content blocker for iOS</a>. It works in Safari and when developers embed <a href="https://www.macstories.net/stories/ios-9-and-safari-view-controller-the-future-of-web-views/">the Safari component</a> in their own apps to display web content.</p>
<h2>Can my device run Better?</h2>
<h2 id="better-on-my-device">Can my device run Better?</h2>
<p><strong>It can if it has a 64-bit processor.</strong></p>
......@@ -49,13 +49,13 @@
<p><strong>Full list of devices Better runs on:</strong> iPod touch 6, iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPhone 6S, iPhone 6S Plus, iPhone SE, iPad Air, iPad Air 2, iPad mini 2, iPad mini 3, iPad mini 4, and iPad Pro.</p>
<h2>Is Better available on Mac OS X?</h2>
<h2 id="better-on-osx">Is Better available on Mac OS X?</h2>
<p><strong>Not yet.</strong></p>
<p>We’ve submitted Better as a Safari Extension for the Safari Extension Gallery and it is currently awaiting approval by Apple.</p>
<h2>Will you make an Android version?</h2>
<h2 id="better-on-android">Will you make an Android version?</h2>
<p><strong>No.</strong></p>
......@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
<p>That said, <a href="https://source.ind.ie/better">Better is free and open source</a> and <a href="https://source.ind.ie/better/content">all of Better’s content is in the commons</a> under a Creative Commons ShareAlike license so anyone who wants to make an Android version (perhaps for <a href="https://f-droid.org">the F-Droid store</a>, for <a href="http://www.greenbot.com/article/2452614/how-to-sideload-an-app-onto-your-android-phone-or-tablet.html">sideloading</a>, or as part of a third-party browser.</p>
<h2>How’s Better different?</h2>
<h2 id="hows-better-different">How’s Better different?</h2>
<p>Better…</p>
......
......@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 2.9% of surveyed sites (126 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 2.8% of surveyed sites (131 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.8% of surveyed sites (77 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.8% of surveyed sites (86 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.8% of surveyed sites (33 instances observed).
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.7% of surveyed sites (34 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 3.2% of surveyed sites (138 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 3.1% of surveyed sites (144 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.4% of surveyed sites (62 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.4% of surveyed sites (68 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.3% of surveyed sites (11 instances observed).
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.3% of surveyed sites (12 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 3.0% of surveyed sites (132 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 2.9% of surveyed sites (138 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.9% of surveyed sites (85 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.9% of surveyed sites (89 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 3.3% of surveyed sites (146 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 3.2% of surveyed sites (152 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.6% of surveyed sites (26 instances observed).
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.6% of surveyed sites (28 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ Decentralised, free and open alternatives that adhere better to the [Ethical Des
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.8% of surveyed sites (37 instances observed).
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.9% of surveyed sites (40 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Pandemic:</strong> found on 12.5% of surveyed sites (546 instances observed).
<p><strong>Pandemic:</strong> found on 12.1% of surveyed sites (570 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 3.8% of surveyed sites (166 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 3.9% of surveyed sites (182 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 2.4% of surveyed sites (103 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 2.3% of surveyed sites (108 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Epidemic:</strong> found on 5.2% of surveyed sites (229 instances observed).
<p><strong>Epidemic:</strong> found on 5.1% of surveyed sites (238 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.7% of surveyed sites (74 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.6% of surveyed sites (74 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 2.2% of surveyed sites (95 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 2.1% of surveyed sites (100 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 2.4% of surveyed sites (103 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 2.2% of surveyed sites (103 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 3.3% of surveyed sites (145 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 3.3% of surveyed sites (153 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.3% of surveyed sites (13 instances observed).
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.3% of surveyed sites (15 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Decentralised, free and open alternatives that adhere better to the [Ethical Des
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.9% of surveyed sites (38 instances observed).
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.8% of surveyed sites (38 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Pandemic:</strong> found on 18.4% of surveyed sites (804 instances observed).
<p><strong>Pandemic:</strong> found on 18.1% of surveyed sites (850 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.9% of surveyed sites (83 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.9% of surveyed sites (89 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 4.0% of surveyed sites (177 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 4.0% of surveyed sites (187 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Pandemic:</strong> found on 13.0% of surveyed sites (569 instances observed).
<p><strong>Pandemic:</strong> found on 12.9% of surveyed sites (608 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.2% of surveyed sites (8 instances observed).
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.2% of surveyed sites (9 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.3% of surveyed sites (58 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.3% of surveyed sites (61 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.7% of surveyed sites (30 instances observed).
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.6% of surveyed sites (30 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 4.2% of surveyed sites (182 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 4.9% of surveyed sites (229 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.9% of surveyed sites (82 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.9% of surveyed sites (88 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Epidemic:</strong> found on 5.9% of surveyed sites (256 instances observed).
<p><strong>Epidemic:</strong> found on 5.7% of surveyed sites (270 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 2.7% of surveyed sites (118 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 2.6% of surveyed sites (124 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.5% of surveyed sites (65 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.4% of surveyed sites (68 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 4.5% of surveyed sites (195 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 4.3% of surveyed sites (202 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 4.7% of surveyed sites (207 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 4.6% of surveyed sites (216 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 2.0% of surveyed sites (86 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.9% of surveyed sites (90 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.2% of surveyed sites (7 instances observed).
<p><strong>Moderate:</strong> found on 0.1% of surveyed sites (7 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 4.7% of surveyed sites (206 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 4.5% of surveyed sites (213 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.7% of surveyed sites (75 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.6% of surveyed sites (77 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Epidemic:</strong> found on 5.5% of surveyed sites (241 instances observed).
<p><strong>Epidemic:</strong> found on 5.6% of surveyed sites (261 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 4.6% of surveyed sites (200 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 4.6% of surveyed sites (215 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>Epidemic:</strong> found on 7.8% of surveyed sites (341 instances observed).
<p><strong>Epidemic:</strong> found on 7.5% of surveyed sites (354 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 1.9% of surveyed sites (83 instances observed).
<p><strong>High:</strong> found on 2.2% of surveyed sites (105 instances observed).
<!-- /prevalence --></p>
</section>
......
<
......@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
<section id="prevalence">
<h2>Prevalence</h2>
<!-- prevalence -->