Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
S
site
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 23
    • Issues 23
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 8
    • Merge Requests 8
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Environments
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • Small Technology Foundation web site
  • site
  • Issues
  • #57

Closed
Open
Opened Aug 26, 2019 by Laura Kalbag@laura❤Maintainer
  • Report abuse
  • New issue
Report abuse New issue

Should we say “inclusive and accessible”, not just “accessible”

I’ve changed the section about accessible small technology (4c09bd3a) to be more concise. It also explains the difference between inclusion and accessibility. The former encapsulates the latter, but not the other way around, so I’m wondering if we should have “inclusive and accessible” in our list instead of “accessible.” This is also a shorthand to include stuff like not being racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic etc. (Though perhaps it may also be better to state these things explicitly.)

Assignee
Assign to
Site Launch
Milestone
Site Launch
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
1
Labels
copy
Assign labels
  • View project labels
Reference: small-tech.org/site#57

Like this? Fund us! Your patronage helps keep us independent and going.